TO FOLLOW SEQUENCE PLEASE BEGIN AT THE END:
Diocese
of Pennsylvania Standing Committee Open Forum
Sunday, October 14, 2007
St. Mary’s Church, Wayne
Welcome by Glenn Matis, President of Standing
Committee
Welcome by Dean Michael Pearson, Rector, St. Mary’s
Church, Wayne
Opening Hymn
Introduction of Members of the Standing Committee
Introduction of Members of Finance & Property
Acknowledgement of Wapiti Board
Acknowledgement of Diocesan Council
Ground rules
COMPLETE FORUM
STATEMENT CONCERNING OUR FINANCIAL CRISIS AND NOTICE OF OPEN FORUM OCTOBER 14, 2007
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Peter Wilmerding, Chair Finance & Property
Cc: Stephen P. Chawaga, Esq., Chancellor
From: The Standing Committee of the Episcopal
Diocese of Pennsylvania
Date: Friday, September 07, 2007
We thank you and the members of the Finance &
Property Committee for the opportunity to
participate in the important discussion about
Wapiti.
After meeting with the members of Finance & Property
and the Executive Committee of the Diocesan Council
on Wednesday, September 5, 2007, the Standing
Committee took the following position:
We have come to the recognition that this Diocese
cannot afford Wapiti: the Wilderness Retreat in
Maryland.
We will give our canonically required consent for
the Diocese to obtain a commercial mortgage to
purchase the land from The Conservation Fund subject
to the following stipulations:
• The Wapiti property is to be sold.
• All proceeds from the sale of the property in
excess of the amount required to satisfy the
mortgage are to be used to restore
the
endowment funds which were used to purchase,
improve and maintain Wapiti.
• In order to minimize the carrying costs until the
property is sold, Wapiti will cease operation as of
October 15, 2007.
Please note that this is our response based on the
information provided at the meeting and that
additional legal and financial advice is needed to
identify the requirements that we would need in
order to approve a prudent and timely mortgage and
to confirm a process and timeline for the sale of
the property.
At
its regularly scheduled meeting on June
19, 2007, the Standing Committee discussed the
proposed Cathedral Commons project with highly
respected and knowledgeable members of the Diocese
including the Dean of the Cathedral. After a
lengthy discussion, the Standing Committee continues
to have significant reservations about the
conception and execution of this proposed real
estate transaction in light of our financial crisis
and Episcopate leadership concerns.
Our concern is also that essential information is
lacking and that definite answers concerning actual
financial obligations to the Diocese (and the
Cathedral Chapter) related to the proposed
transaction are required before further commitments
are made. We also question if the emphasis on real
estate acquisition and development is sidetracking
us from the call of Jesus to spread the Gospel,
especially among the poor and weak.
We continue to respect those who disagree with our
views and in no way question their love and devotion
for the Church and for the people of this Diocese.
At its regularly scheduled meeting on May 22, 2007, the Standing Committee listened to highly respected and knowledgeable members of the Diocese express their diverse opinions concerning the feasibility of the Cathedral Campus project. After a lengthy discussion, the Standing Committee came to share the opinion of those who have significant reservations about the conception and execution of this general plan. Coupled with our on-going and unresolved crises in leadership, finances and trust, we do not believe pursuing this venture would be positive for the Diocese, but will in fact intensify our problems. We also question if the emphasis on real estate acquisition and development is sidetracking us from the call of Jesus to spread the Gospel, especially among the poor and weak.
After
meeting with the Wapiti Board on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, the
Standing Committee of the Episcopal Diocese of
Pennsylvania reaffirms its decision of Tuesday, April 24, 2007
not consenting to the request “for designation of proceeds from
sale of closed church properties for the youth program in the
amount of $144,000.”
For ten years we have labored under questionable Diocesan
priorities. Therefore, until the Wapiti Board recognizes the
chaotic state of our Diocese as an inevitable result of our
dysfunctional Episcopal leadership, we remain firm in our
decision concerning the request for funds.
The
Standing Committee of the
Episcopal Diocese of Pennsylvania
Article Appearing in The Living Church, March 29th edition
National Episcopal Body to Hear Bishops Case, Philadelphia Inquirer Article March 31, 2007
Letter of March 14, 2007, from David Beers to be distributed to the Complainants
On Friday, March 2, 2007, the members of the Standing Committee and those who had filed the complaint against Bishop Bennison had a meeting with David Beers, Chancellor to the Presiding Bishop, and his assistant, Mary E. Kostel, and Michael F. Rehill, Special Counsel to the Standing Committee, and his assistant Pamela L. Lutz. It was a full and frank discussion of the complaint against Bishop Bennison and the canonical process and procedures. It is anticipated that the complaint will now be forwarded by the Presiding Bishop to the Title IV Review Committee for consideration.
The
Standing Committee of the Diocese of Pennsylvania renews its
unanimous call for the resignation or retirement of the Rt.
Rev. Charles E. Bennison, Jr. In addition, we stand by the
Bishop Matthews Report which accurately describes the depth
of division and the denial expressed by the Bishop as to the
serious nature and profound effects of this conflict.
Furthermore, we hold accountable those in the Episcopal
Church’s executive offices who withheld information of
Bishop Bennison’s leadership about the matters concerning
his brother’s sexual misconduct while in his employ. This
information was withheld from the Search Committee and
Standing Committee at the time of Bishop Bennison’s
election.
March 1, 2007
COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST BISHOP BENNISON
THE STANDING COMMITTEE SEEKS FUNDS
TO OBTAIN LEGAL COUNSEL
POSITION
OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CANON TO THE ORDINARY
MANAGEMENT LETTERS - 2002,
2003 AND 2004
SPECIAL AUDIT
COMMITTEE LETTER
CBIZ SPECIAL AUDIT REPORT
RECONCILIATION AND MEDIATION DEFINED:
Reconciliation is a goal to which two or more parties may wish to attain or aspire. In relationships it is often taken to mean restoring the relationship to its former status after some process has brought the parties to this goal. The Standing Committee agrees with the conclusion of the Matthew's report that reconciliation is not a viable option given the previous attempts that have been made over many years.
Mediation is a process by which two or more parties agree to use an outside resource (mediator) to enable them to come to a mutual agreement. In mediation the goal is to find a mutual agreement, but what that may be, is left open to working the process through.
For example, mediation might lead the parties to work toward reconciliation or to work out a time line for dissolving the relationship; set up an agreement of respectful behaviors among the parties as leave taking goes on; discuss conditions that might help both parties let go and move forward with dignity. The Standing Committee sees mediation as a more open ended option that allows creative negotiating which might allow the discovery of a more faithful use of our gifts.
The Standing Committee is the ecclesiastical authority of the diocese in the absence of a bishop. The Standing Committee is elected by the diocesan convention. Half of its members are clerical, half lay. It serves as the bishop's council of advice. The Standing Committee is requested to give consent for all bishops elected in the Episcopal Church. It recommends persons for ordination. It gives the bishop advice and consent on the purchase, sale, or encumbrance of any property held by a congregation or the diocese. It gives the bishop advice and consent as to any judicial sentence given to a clergy person or concurs in allowing a clergy person to cease functioning as a member of the clergy. It investigates and reports to the bishop on the charge that a deacon or priest has abandoned the Episcopal Church. It also receives the bishop's resignation.
Source: ECUSA News Service
Diocese of Pennsylvania Financial Timeline
April 21, 2006 Open Letter to Bishop
Bennison from the Standing Committee
The Rev. Mary Laney's Response to Mr. George
Whitfield 's Comments at Council
Passionate Plea from the Union of Black Episcopalians
Resolution
from Special Convention Regarding Full Accounting of Net Assets